Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
Yes, that is a bounds. And it is a broad one. Broad enough that even that one word - apostle - is unclear enough that we don't really know what to do with it.
And it seems to have significantly unique a standing, at lest in some minds, that an apostle could either be rejectable as a teacher and still be a legitimate apostle, or could be acceptable as a teacher and be rejected as an apostle.
|
I do believe that some gifts to the body, considered by some to be an apostle in operation, may later be disqualified due to personal failure. This perhaps may have been the impetus for Rome's "infallibility" tenet.
At least Rome had a caveat for their MotaPope's, vis-a-vis their actions may criminal, but their teachings are "infallible." Anaheim had no such caveat.