Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
And this is what I find continually lacking in these kinds of arguments...
|
This is what I find totally lacking in your argument.
1. The Bible says that the Lord's response was an answer to Job's question. Your interpretation doesn't answer his question.
2. The Bible says that Job received this response as an answer, whereas those the Lord rebuked gave an interpretation similar to you, God is almighty, if He wants to do this, tough. Job rejected that response.
3. The bible repeatedly requires you to read the Bible to understand other parts of the Bible. I gave the example in Gen 1, Peter even says that no verse is of its own interpretation, yet your rule is that every verse must be of its own interpretation. You violate Biblical principles and common sense in your interpretation.