Thread: Apostles
View Single Post
Old 08-27-2011, 06:23 PM   #69
Ohio
Member
 
Ohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Greater Ohio
Posts: 13,693
Default Re: Combating LC Arguments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igzy View Post
I'm curious where these are noted as apostles. I considered them co-workers. But not necessarily apostles themselves.
Here are some relatively unknown folks who were considered apostles. Phil 2.25 Epaphroditus was Philippi's apostle. Acts 14.14 Barnabas was an apostle. I Cor 15.7 implies a large number of apostles, separate from Paul and the Twelve. Rom 16.7 says Andronicus and Junia were notable among the apostles. Junia is especially interesting because the name is feminine. Other verses list other apostles.


Quote:
I wouldn't totally object to calling someone an apostle today. My chief point was that the LRC borrowed the apostolic status of Paul and others and imbued it to WL. So I think every LRC member at one time wondered, "Is God giving WL further revelation?" I know staunch LSMers have no problem with that, and to me it's dangerous.
I agree with this. Rome endues popes with the status of Peter. The Recovery endues WN and WL with the "better" status of Paul. Neither systems have been blessed by this error, and many saints have suffered loss, being robbed of Christ, the Head.
__________________
Ohio's motto is: With God all things are possible!.
Keeping all my posts short, quick, living, and to the point!
Ohio is offline   Reply With Quote