Quote:
Originally Posted by ZNPaaneah
So although it might be useful in a law court to defend "pray reading" it is hard to imagine that anyone reading this book would understand it to defend a superficial practice as so eloquently described by OBW complete with metaphors and figurative language.
|
I disagree, it's really not hard to imagine. It's harder to imagine that their booklet written in defense of "pray reading" actually had nothing to do with their own practice of "pray reading" at all!!
Couldn't you say the same thing about any number of books on "the ground" or "the oneness" which were
actually used to defend the standing of a very sectarian group?
Z, didn't RG himself tell you the story about
Mr. Wood-eye?