Quote:
Originally Posted by KSA
As I sain in another thread, it is ok to use types, provided there is an anti-type. In this case there is no anti-type in the New Testament of the Son of God being substituted with the Lamb of God.
|
In John 1:29, the apostle John saw clearly the Lord Jesus. Can you please tell me whether what the apostle John saw was a Lamb or the Lord Himself.
Quote:
John 1
29The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, "Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
|
Would you believe that the apostle John might have known Genesis 22? If not, where did John get the idea to call the Lord Jesus as the "Lamb of God"?
You were looking for the "anti-type in the New Testament" regarding the Son of God becoming the Lamb of God? Perhaps, we can try the following verses:
Quote:
1 Corinthians 5:7
Get rid of the old yeast that you may be a new batch without yeast—as you really are. For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.
|
Quote:
1 Peter 1:19
but with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect.
|
Quote:
Revelation 5:6
Then I saw a Lamb, looking as if it had been slain, standing in the center of the throne, encircled by the four living creatures and the elders. He had seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God sent out into all the earth.
|
Quote:
Revelation 5:12
In a loud voice they sang: "Worthy is the Lamb, who was slain, to receive power and wealth and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and praise!"
|
Quote:
Revelation 21:9
One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the seven last plagues came and said to me, "Come, I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb."
|
Quote:
Revelation 21:14
The wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
|