Quote:
Originally Posted by OBW
I'm impressed. This "little" work takes on a core theological construct of Witness Lee. They are beginning openly do more than question where the LSM and the BBs have taken Lee since his death. Now even Lee is subject to question.
I wsh I could get my dad to actually read this thing. It will probably be too much to take in at one time. But it is a profound word to be coming from within what is still theoretically the LRC (even if no longer assiciated with the LSM).
|
Wish
Ohio were around to comment on this. I thought Nigel Tomes had several articles openly questioning some of Lee's teachings? (ex.: the curse of Canaan/Ham, etc.).