[OBW]

Sorry, but unimpressed. For starters, this guy is basing upon the premise that the Nee underpinnings were actually right. He speaks of Nee's city-church as simply being scripturally correct, in so many words. So even if he disagrees with Lee, he is thinking in terms of an alternative to Lee under the guidelines of Nee.

That is not the argument that I make. And my argument is that those who meet in the LRC should not meet together, but that they are not special relative to any other Christian assembly for doing so. And as long as they hold to many of Lee's (and Nee's) poor theology, they are hamstringing their experience. It does not make them unChristian or heretical. It just makes their reality far from their claim.