Quote:
I really could care less where this doctrine came from or if it came from anyone in particular. The discussions running counter to it are just really weak and illogical.
That's all I'm really saying. I'm completely open to hearing Lee was wrong about anything, including this point, but what I've heard herein just ain't it. All I've heard is, well, Lee's doctrine doesn't fit the ancient doctrine very well so we'd like to come up with something different that maybe does fit the ancient doctrine better.
|
I think I'm in the same boat. I'm ready to be convinced, but haven't seen a convincing argument yet that a life-giving spirit is different from the Holy Spirit. Sme with, now the Lord is the Spirit. Why is problematic if the new Testament shows us a deep unity between the Son and the Spirit?
For me it has nothing to do with Lee math. It seems to be what the Bible is saying.