Quote:
Originally Posted by bearbear
....
So in a sense I think Witness Lee did practice the teachings of the Nicolaitans by not correcting his sons for their unrepentant sexual immorality including what we now know includes sexual abuse of minors. Because of Witness Lee's salvation theology, he may have believed that his sons were saved and hence he did not feel the need to correct them.
...
Ephesians 5:11
Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.
|
bearbear,
Would you say that Witness Lee's tolerance of the sins of his sons, extend to the current leaders of the Local Churches? Today's obvious tolerance of unrepentant sexual abuse of its membership (mostly women that we know about) current LC leaders have followed Lee into hell.
Todays LC leadership who are following Lee in his sin are indeed the "blind leaders of the blind." These men have already been judged for their deeds of darkness:
Matthew 18:6
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
For more information see John Ingalls'
Speaking the Truth in Love.
The Lee/LC rebuttal to John was documented in "Fermentation of the Present Rebellion."
Nell