Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohio
I had planned to stay out of this particular discussion, but …
I believe Jay posts in good faith, and more importantly, he has a mindset that matched my own for some 30 years, so his voice should be welcomed.
However, I have also been around here a long time, and it is a privilege, not a right, to post here. This forum has a Mission Statement with clearly defined rules enforced by UntoHim and Nell. These rules grew out of years of violations, so they are not negotiable. Amen?
Discussions here, and even spirited debates, must only be based on Scripture and reasoned ideas. This is challenging, I agree. But the line cannot be crossed and become personal. There are Christian standards here that will be upheld. Ad hominems are always the easy way out, but must not be resorted to. Like the Lord instructs us, apologies then can quickly restore communication.
|
I agree Jay has a mindset that we can all recognize from the LC and should be welcomed.
I don't think anyone necessarily thinks it's a right to be able to post here. I've always known this whole thing is at the discretion of UntoHim and whoever is co-mod at the time. I remember when there used to be a small donation box on the left and Nell was a frequent donator. That donation box was always a reminder to me that this forum comes with a cost and there are people behind the scenes making all this work.
It's funny, I looked up "what does a forum moderator do" last night and the phrases I saw on various articles were things like "unsung heroes" and "thankless job". Seems about right.
I agree the rules should be followed, but "not negotiable" makes it sound like there is no room for "hey what about this?" kind of good faith questions in response to the rules. I think Nell's response indicates this is still possible, which I think helps clear up a source of misunderstanding that had occurred.
I kind of disagree that discussions must only be based on Scripture and reasoned ideas, no ad hominems, etc.... The reason I say this is because that would preclude lots of LC members who are quite literally not used to even thinking that way! If this was the case, then half of Drake/EvanG's posts which were not based even remotely on reasoned ideas would have been deleted and shut down long ago and they would have been modded out of here. But that would have subsequently also eliminated all the helpful stuff that came out of those kind of posts of theirs. Ad hominems need to be allowed, at least a little, so that people who don't know what an ad hominem is (i.e. ME when i was in the LC!!) have a chance to learn without being ejected. We all seemed to be able to take all that in stride pretty easily in the past, so I don't know why we can't now. I think this is part of where I'm fumbling around on this.
Trapped