Quote:
Originally Posted by aron
You are reading Lee's theology back onto the text as he trained you to do so. But where in the NT is the basis? There are dozens of quotes showing revelation, but nothing that I can find where they (Jesus, Paul, Peter) pan the natural concepts of David. There is no precedent for this interpretive position. It was an approach of selfish convenience to prop up a weak theology. The fallen concepts belong to Lee, not David.
|
There's plenty of old testament verses that aren't quoted, interpreted, or deconstructed in the New Testament. And they just don't have to be. Your logic isn't sound here. But anyway it's obvious that Lee is right about David, and he clearly explains himself in the footnotes with comparison to the New Testament. When David asks God to smite his enemies Lee says that David's concept was fallen and sinful, and Lee uses the New Testament to prove it citing Matthew 5:38-39
That's just a correct assessment. All the stuff you added to attack Lee with regards to his assessment of David is just baseless unfortunately