Quote:
Originally Posted by Zezima
If the Bible isn’t clear on a doctrine, then that should be proof enough to debunk a strongly preached doctrine in the Recovery right?
|
So it would seem. But this is only one of many Lee/Nee "strong" doctrines and/or teachings that have little more than descriptive mention in scripture.
That being the case, why is this place called
"the Recovery"? Teaching after teaching of Witness Lee has been debunked or classified as heretical? Perhaps a good topic would be to list what has actually been "recovered". Sometimes it's called "
the Lord's Recovery." Really? How does this sect belong to the Lord?
Nell