Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Vusik
I’m curious if the LC view in the written statement about the work of MOTA is viewed as a “proper view”, and “adequate” or to be more precise “correct and complete” vs the actual Apostle like James. Any written statements regarding those comparisons? Or even specifically in relation to WL.
|
Both the Brethren and the Recovery views of MOTA (probably built upon the Protestant) of the Apostleship of James are pejorative. James, the brother of the Lord, and not one of the Twelve, is even viewed by some as a fraud. The MOTA view of an Apostle is almost singularly based on Paul, with the later addition of John.
For James, you could look at the Life Study of James.