Quote:
Originally Posted by Zezima
Can you summarize your original post?
|
The short version is - Lee concealed the unorthodox view of mingling human nature and divine elements in Christ's incarnation by saying it was "not merging into one." In other words, to Lee, since the flour (humanity) and oil (divinity) were mixed in such a way that the flour is still "complete" (the flour is still flour and not oil) and the oil is "complete," (the oil is still the oil and not flour), nothing was changed. This never made sense to me - when you mix to complete things, like red ink and blue ink, a third thing - purple ink is produced. Change is inherent to mixing. Lee tried to twist the English language to say that mixing does NOT necessarily equal change. To conclude, Lee would have us worship a "hybrid Jesus," who is not the Second Person. And that is not any minor point of doctrine but a critical aspect of any Christian's belief system.